Johannes Bergsmann & Daniel Bauer
Are you still programming unit tests or already generating?
#1about 1 minute
Moving from manual unit testing to automated generation
The goal of test generation is to move from manual coding to a low-code platform that improves requirements coverage and collaboration between developers, testers, and requirements engineers.
#2about 2 minutes
Extending black box testing into the unit test level
The testing pyramid shows how black box testing, which focuses on requirements and interfaces, can be extended into the unit testing level, traditionally dominated by white box source code analysis.
#3about 4 minutes
Using equivalence classes and boundary values for testing
Black box testing relies on equivalence class partitioning and boundary value analysis to systematically test value ranges and their edges, where errors frequently occur.
#4about 2 minutes
A maturity model for unit testing beyond code coverage
A proposed maturity model for unit testing progresses from having no tests to implementing a full strategy with risk analysis and black box methods, moving beyond simple code coverage metrics.
#5about 2 minutes
Why 100% code coverage does not guarantee quality
High code coverage is the minimum requirement, not the goal, as it doesn't ensure that requirements are met or that the right tests have been written.
#6about 2 minutes
The workflow of the DevMate test code generator
DevMate parses a project's source code, stores its structure in an intermediate JSON model, allows users to define test data in a UI, and then generates standard, versionable test code.
#7about 7 minutes
Using systematic test data to find hidden code defects
A demonstration shows how to define valid and invalid test data based on requirements, automatically combine them into test cases, and generate code that reveals missing input validations.
#8about 2 minutes
Creating unit and integration tests with a visual canvas
Visit Test is a new standalone, web-based tool that provides a visual canvas for designing test scenarios, decision flows, and integration tests before generating code.
#9about 8 minutes
Q&A on test goals, AI generation, and tool specifics
The discussion covers setting better testing goals, the limitations of using ChatGPT for systematic test generation, how the tool handles code changes, and its local-only processing architecture.
Related jobs
Jobs that call for the skills explored in this talk.
Matching moments
11:21 MIN
Accelerating development by generating various types of tests
GitHub Copilot Beyond the Basics - 10 Ways to Elevate Your Coding
17:04 MIN
Going beyond unit tests with modern application testing
What Developers Get Wrong About Application Quality
23:34 MIN
Demo of automating unit test generation and validation
Rethinking Workflows in the Agentic Era
00:02 MIN
The journey from manual execution to automated testing
How not to test
36:52 MIN
The future of developer tools in an AI-driven world
Are frameworks like React redundant in an AI world?
00:05 MIN
Setting the stage for a test automation project
How to add test automation to your project: The good, the bad, and the ugly
05:29 MIN
Using tests to manage AI-generated code and bugs
10 commandments for vibe coding
00:58 MIN
Why developers often view unit testing as a chore
Test-reduction - Doing more with less
Featured Partners
Related Videos
Write tests you love, not hate
Jens Happe
Continuous testing - run automated tests for every change!
Christian Kühn
Your Testing Strategy is broken - lets fix it!
Luise Freese
Test-reduction - Doing more with less
Ewald Verhoeven
Breaking the Bug Cycle: TDD for the Win
Nadeen Hussein
How Unit Testing Saved My Career
Annelore Egger
How not to test
Golo Roden
Using code generation for test automation – the fancy way
Roman Alexis Anastasini
Related Articles
View all articles



From learning to earning
Jobs that call for the skills explored in this talk.




Software Quality Engineer | manuelle und automatisierte Softwaretests, ISTQB | 60% HO (mwd)
Vesterling Consulting GmbH
€50-69K

Software Quality Engineer | manuelle und automatisierte Softwaretests, ISTQB | 60% HO (mwd)
Vesterling Consulting GmbH
€51-71K



