Work efficiently with Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)

A simple text file saved hundreds of teams from solving the same problem twice. Learn how Architecture Decision Records can scale your organization's technical knowledge.

#1about 7 minutes

Why documenting architectural decisions is crucial

Undocumented decisions lead to repeated discussions and confusion, wasting valuable team time and effort.

#2about 6 minutes

Defining design decisions at different levels of abstraction

Design decisions exist at the code, solution, and application levels, with architectural decisions focusing on high-impact choices like patterns and frameworks.

#3about 3 minutes

Using the arc42 template for lightweight documentation

The arc42 template provides a standardized, lightweight structure for technical documentation, with a dedicated chapter for architecture decisions.

#4about 6 minutes

Understanding the structure of an Architecture Decision Record

An ADR template captures the title, decision, status, context, consequences, and alternatives to provide a clear and concise record of a choice.

#5about 9 minutes

Best practices for writing effective ADR components

Writing effective ADRs requires precise language, clear status tracking, comprehensive context, and a thorough evaluation of alternatives.

#6about 10 minutes

Managing many ADRs using a Docs as Code approach

A Docs as Code workflow using AsciiDoc and Git enables versioning, peer review, and the generation of a searchable static site for large ADR collections.

#7about 6 minutes

Scaling ADRs for team alignment and corporate efficiency

Implementing a peer review process for documentation improves quality, while making ADRs transparent across an organization prevents redundant work and saves significant costs.

#8about 3 minutes

Making ADRs discoverable with an internal search engine

Integrating the ADR microsite with a corporate search engine makes architectural decisions easily discoverable, fostering knowledge sharing across the entire organization.